← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38577/2025disposed

Sunil Chaudhary @ Dr. Sunil Chaudhari @ Dr. Sunil Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-06Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38577 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1125 Year-2024 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sunil Chaudhary @ Dr. Sunil Chaudhari @ Dr. Sunil Chaudhary S/o- Late Nandu Chaudhary R/o- Watganj, P.S.- Piprakothi, Dist- East Champaran at Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Deepmala Kumari W/o- Dr. Sunil Chaudhari @ Dr. Sunil Chaudhary, D/oVinod Chaudhary R/o- Dhekahan Bishunpur Ps- Piprakothi Dist- East Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 On 18.06.2025 this case was heard and the petitioner was granted provisional bail till 30.07.2025 and the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation Centre for amicable settlement.

2. Report of the Mediator dated 24.07.2025 has been received and as per the report the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and vague allegations of demand of dowry which are false and even during mediation, the O.P. No. 2 was not ready to reside with the petitioner, however, the learned counsel for the Opposite Party no. 2 has stated that the Opposite Party no. 2 is the wife of the petitioner and she is ready to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38577 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 reside with the petitioner.

4. In view of the fact that the matter has not been settled before the Mediation Centre, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 18.06.2025 in connection with Complaint Case No. 1125 of 2024, is hereby confirmed subject to the conditions :

(i) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court.

(ii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be canceled by the Court concerned.

5. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial. (Sourendra Pandey, J) Prakash/- U