Prinsh Pandey @ Prinsh Kumar @ Bhuwar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37220 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-724 Year-2024 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Prinsh Pandey @ Prinsh Kumar @ Bhuwar S/O Shailesh Pandey @ Shailesh Kumar Pandey Resident of Village- Tarwar, P.S.- Bheldi, Distt.- Saran, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 724/2024 dated 14.12.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., Section 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 20(B)(ii)(C) and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 1.500 kg. Ganja was recovered from the truck. The petitioner and the co-accused persons were found sitting in the said vehicle. On search of the petitioner, one loaded katta and a mobile phone were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37220 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The seized contraband is less than commercial quantity. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 30.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20641/2025. As per para. 12 of the bail petition, the petitioner is the neither the owner nor the driver of the truck or Nexor car. The petitioner has two antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 14.12.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 724/2024, with the condition ;- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37220 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3 cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T