Vinay Kumar Pappu v. State Election Commission, Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.948 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12051 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Vinay Kumar Pappu, aged about 42 years, S/o Late Dr. S.N. Roy Yadav, resident of Goriatoli, Station Road, Patna, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna, Bihar.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. State Election Commission, Bihar, Patna through its Secretary.

2. Deputy Secretary, State Election Commission, Bihar, Patna.

3. Patna Municipal Corporation through the Municipal Commissioner, Patna cum the Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Mauryalok Building, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. District Election Officer (Municipal Corporation) cum District Magistrate, Patna, Bihar.

5. Afzal Imam, Councilor of Ward No.52 of Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

6. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Town Planning and Housing.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 25-08-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that with the passage of time, the writ application has been rendered infructuous.

The application is dismissed as infructuous.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C. jha/- U