Rekha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10397 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Rekha Kumari W/o Arun Kumar R/o Cold Storage Shahganj, P.O.- Mahendru, P.S. Sultanganj, Dist.- Patna.
2.
Raj Kumar Singh Son of Gopal Singh R/o- Village New Kunj Colony East Bahadurpur, P.O.- Rajendranagar, P.S.- Bahadurpur, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Department of Education, State of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Director (Primary Education), Education Department, State of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, Vaishali.
4.
The District Education Officer, Vaishali.
5.
The District Program Officer, (Establishment), Vaishali. 6.
The Block Development Officer, Raghopur, Vaishali. 7.
The Block Education Officer, Raghopur, Vaishali. 8.
The President-cum-Pramukh, Block Employment Committee, Raghopur, Vaishali.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Madanjeet Kumar (Gp20) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2023 The petitioner by way of this writ petition has(have) prayed as under :
"(i) To direct the respondent authority to pay the salary of the petitioners with effect from 12.11.2018 to till date.
(ii) To further direct the respondent authority not to disturb the petitioners to discharging their duty as a Block teacher under Raghopur Block, Vaishali."
Patna High Court CWJC No.10397 of 2022(3) dt.10-01-2023 2/3 The petitioners pray that their salary be released. Keeping in view the observations made by this Court in C.W.J.C No. 22186 of 2019 (Pallavi Kumari Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.) and analogous cases dated 29.11.2022 has held as under:- "8. Keeping in view above, it is directed that the salary of the teachers shall not be withheld on excuses as above and arrears of salary shall also be released. Fund in this regard shall be made available by the Education Department to the concerned employment units for the purpose of payment. It is made clear that if the arrears are not released within a stipulated period of four months from today, the teachers would be entitled to receive interest on the arrears of the amount of salary at the rate of nine per cent. The interest amount shall be recoverable from the respective District Education Officers/ District Programme Establishment Officer.
9. If the salary/arrears of salary are not released, the concerned teacher would also be entitled to file an appeal before the respective District Appellate Authority. If such an appeal is preferred, the same shall be decided expeditiously within a period of three months. If required, the District Appellate Authority/State Appellate Authority would be also empowered to impose penalty in terms of Rule 16 of the Rules of 2020 which provides as under:
Patna High Court CWJC No.10397 of 2022(3) dt.10-01-2023 3/3 "16. Power to impose Punishment:- In case of non-compliance of the order/direction or in case of any complaints by the party for compliance of the order:- (i) The Appellate Authority shall impose punishment against-concerned party but he will be given adequate opportunity of hearing before imposing punishment.
(ii) The Appellate Authority may impose penalty upto Rs. 50,000/- (Fifty thousand only) upon the answerable party. The amount of penalty shall be deposited in the Treasury under the head indicated by the Department. The amount of penalty shall be recoverable by way of Public demand. (iii) The Appellate Authority shall have jurisdiction to make recommendation to the concerned Department to initiate Departmental proceeding or to take necessary action against the delinquent employee under the provisions of Bihar Service Code/Bihar Panchayat Raj Act 2006/Bihar Municipal Act 2007 and other relevant provisions." Keeping in view above, the same directions are held to be applicable in the present case mutatis mutandis. The writ petition is allowed accordingly.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Shamshad/- Item No. 22 U