Subhan Alam @ Aryan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37262 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2024 Thana- GALGALIYA District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Subhan Alam @ Aryan S/O Saidul Rahman @ Saidur Rahman Resident of Village- Kaubhittha Ward No. 19, P.S- Kurlikot, Distt.- Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhola Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Galgalia P.S. Case No. 84 of 2024 dated 27.10.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 8 (c), 21 (c) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 460.8 grams of brown sugar like substance, a silver weight machine, one mobile phone and a motorcycle were recovered from the possession of the co-accused persons, Md. Murad who disclosed that he was working for the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37262 of 2025(2) dt.13-08-2025 2/2 statement of the co-accused, Md. Murad. The petitioner has two antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 06.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the seized contraband is more than commercial quantity.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Kishanganj in connection with Galgalia P.S. Case No. 84 of 2024, with the condition ;- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T