Jitendra Prasad Keshari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35657 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2018 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== Jitendra Prasad Keshari, aged about 28 years, Male, Son of Hardayal Keshari @ Hardayal Prasad Keshari, Resident of Village - Kulharia, P.S. - Buxar (M), District - Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A/304(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure-1, giving a liberty to renew his prayer after one year in jail custody.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 14.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35657 of 2019(2) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 case is pending in connection with S. Tr. No.217 of 2018 arising out of Buxar (M) P.S. Case No. 127 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T