Tholi Kumar @ Tholi Kumar Manav Bal Vidyut Apurti Prashakha Puraini v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42871 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2023 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== THOLI KUMAR @ THOLI KUMAR MANAV BAL VIDYUT APURTI PRASHAKHA PURAINI SON OF RAGHU MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILL- NARDHU TOLA WARD NO.- 15 P.S.- CHAUSA, DISTRICTMADHEPURA (MOB NO.- 9572618460) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 20-07-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Chausa P.S. Case no.291 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 353 and 355 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that a call was made by the petitioner asking him to start the electricity connection on the feeder line. The petitioner resorted to hurling abuses and using objectionable languages on the telephone. It is further stated that thereafter the petitioner reached the office of the informant and also created a ruckus. However, before the police was informed and they reached, the petitioner went away.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42871 of 2024(2) dt.20-07-2024 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of departmental dispute and politics. No such occurrence as alleged has taken place. He has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the case.

5. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as is evident from the order of the learned trial Court together with the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Chausa P.S. Case no.291 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Uda Kishunganj, District Madhepura, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T