Ravi Kumar @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12643 of 2017 (2) dt.07-04-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.12643 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2017 Thana -GAYA RAIL P.S. District- GAYA ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Vikash Kumar, Son of Vijay Prasad @ Chhotelal Chouhan, Resident of Village- Simnour, P.S.- Ariori, District- Nalanda, at present Residing at Village- Charuli, Beldari, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Government Rail P.S. Gaya Case No. 03 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner snatched the mobile of the informant and got down from running train but due to alarm being raised, the RPF personnel caught hold the petitioner when he was trying to flee away after snatching the mobile. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has not been caught at the spot, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession, without any fault he is suffering in custody since 04.01.2017 and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration as he has got no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12643 of 2017 (2) dt.07-04-2017 Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner was caught red handed and snatched mobile was recovered from his possession and further the petitioner has tried to conceal his correct address.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected. However, the petitioner may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail after remaining six months in custody. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T