Darvesh Rai @ Darvedh Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40358 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2022 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Darvesh Rai @ Darvedh Rai Son of Late Ram Sarekh Rai Resident of villageBalwan Tola, Ps- Doriganj, Dist- Saran At Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph-4 of the bail petition in course of the day.
2. Heard Mr.Radha Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, learned A.P.P. for the State.
3. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 17.04.2026 in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 111 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 24.03.2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341,323,324,307,504 of IPC.
4. Allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted to the informant with dab causing him grievous injury on the head.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40358 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026 2/3 submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. It appears from the FIR that both the parties are agnates to each other and due to some petty dispute, the present occurrence has taken place. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the informant by means of dabiya and the informant has received the injury and the same is grievous in nature. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to fracture in his finger the injury is grievous in nature and there is case and counter case and the petitioner is in custody since 17.04.2026.
6. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
7. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner has clean antecedent and injury inflicted upon the informant is grievous in nature but the same is not on the vital part of the body, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Saran at Chapra in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 111 of 2022,with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40358 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026 3/3 and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T