Chando Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42429 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-800 Year-2022 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== Chando Mahto son of Late Dharam Mahto @ Late Balo Mahto VillageKatari Hill Balhori bigha, PS- Chandauti Dist-Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Madhu Kumari D/o- Rameshwar Prasad, W/o- Vikash Kumar R/o- Katari Hill Baljori Bigha Ps- Chandauti Dist- Gaya, P/A- Sagarpur Ps-Mohanpur Dist- Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamal Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 498A, 494(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner, being father-in-law, has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the complainant. It is next submitted that petitioner is aged about 64 years and is a senior citizen and is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that son of the petitioner was married to the complainant on 02.07.2014 and on account of dispute in between the husband and the wife, the entire family members including the petitioner came to be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42429 of 2024(3) dt.19-08-2024 2/2 implicated. It is also submitted that whenever any dispute arises in between the husband and the wife, the entire family members are implicated in a mechanical manner with general, omnibus and ornamental allegation.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No. 2 oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 800 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T