Raviranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39742 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-562 Year-2024 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Raviranjan Kumar S/O Sipahi Yadav Resident vill- Arsi Khurd, P.S.- Gurua, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Adarsh Singh, Adv.

Mr. Khalid Faizan. Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 562/2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of the B.N.S.

3. As per prosecution case, the informant had parked his motorcycle bearing Registration No. JH03Q4635 near the Keshav High School. After sometime, it was discovered that the motorcycle was missing. FIR has been lodged against known.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR. The petitioner bears one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail, which is not similar to the present case. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39742 of 2025(4) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 petitioner is not named in the FIR. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He orally submits that during course of investigation, one stolen motorcycle was recovered and seized in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 154/2025 and in the said case, no material was produced with regard to confession of the petitioner in the present case and even the recovery was taken into account, it was not from the exclusive possession of the petitioner. In light of aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, no offence is made out against the petitioner in the aforesaid section.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 562/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39742 of 2025(4) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 482(2) of the B.N.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- U T