Upendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2614 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2016 Thana- SINGHESHWAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

Upendra Yadav SON OF LATE BHAGAWAT PD. YADAV @ BHAGWAT YADAV VILLAGE- BHAWANIPUR, PS- SINGHESHWAR, DISTMADHEPURA 2.

AMARENDRA YADAV @ AMARENDRA KUMAR SON OF SRI UPENDRA YADAV VILLAGE- BHAWANIPUR, PS- SINGHESHWAR, DIST- MADHEPURA 3.

BIRENDRA YADAV @ BIRENDRA KUMAR SON OF SHRI UPENDRA YADAV VILLAGE- BHAWANIPUR, PS- SINGHESHWAR, DISTMADHEPURA 4.

BIRENDRA RAM SON OF SRI SAHDEO RAM VILLAGEBHAWANIPUR, PS- SINGHESHWAR, DIST- MADHEPURA ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

PANO DEVI WIFE OF SHIBO RAM VILLAGE- BHAWANIPUR, PSSINGHESHWAR, DIST- MADHEPURA ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Akash Anand , Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the State .

2. It is submitted by the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State that the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the appellants is not maintainable as cognizance has already been taken by the court below also for the offences punishable under the SC/ST Act. In this regard, reliance is placed in the case of Bachu Das Vs. State of Bihar and others, reported in (2014) 3

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2614 of 2024(4) dt.27-02-2025 2/2 Supreme Court Cases 471.

3. In view of the aforesaid pronouncement of law rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, appellants prayer of pre-arrest is refused.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T