Mirtunjay Yadav @ Mritunjay Kumar @ Piltha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37061 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1222 Year-2023 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Mirtunjay Yadav @ Mritunjay Kumar @ Piltha, S/O Late Ravindar Yadav @ Late Rabin Yadav, R/O village- Maranga, P.S.- K. Hat (Maranga), DistrictPurnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr.Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-09-2025 Heard Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 1222 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 386 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the husband of the informant was being threatened by a mobile call and through snap chat rangdari of Rs. 30,00,000/- was demanded.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37061 of 2025(3) dt.01-09-2025 2/2 case. It has further been submitted that during investigation, it has come that the mobile number from which the call was made does not belong to the petitioner however, it has come that the said sim is being used by this petitioner. It has also been submitted that from perusal of the allegation as a whole it transpires that the only allegation is that of threatening and of demanding rangdari. Actually, no payment has been made. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.04.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of 10 cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Purnia in connection with K.Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 1222 of 2023.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T