Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18592/2017bail granted

Md. Faizan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-04Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18592 of 2017 (2) dt.04-05-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18592 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -140 Year- 2016 Thana -TATARPUR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Md. Faizan, Son of late Md. Mansoor, Resident of- Nawab Colony, Karori Bazaar, P.S.- Habibpur, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anita Kumari Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Tatarpur P.S. Case No. 140 of 2016, registered under Sections 399, 402 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

The accusation is that petitioner along with one Md. Arman was apprehended with country made loaded pistol by the police, in course of planning to commit Dacoity. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case mere on suspicion. It is further submitted that while petitioner in accused in three other cases, but in all three cases, he is on bail and in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18592 of 2017 (2) dt.04-05-2017 present case, he is in custody since 08.10.2016. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Incharge Bhagalpur, in connection with Tatarpur P.S. Case No. 140 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T