← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39659/2022allowed

Ravindra Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-07Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39659 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2021 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Ravindra Manjhi Son Of Rajendra Manjhi R/O Village- Teusa, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya 2.

Subodh Manjhi @ Subodh Kumar Son Of Rajendra Manjhi R/O VillageTeusa, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case as per F.I.R is that all the accused persons including petitioners, variously armed came on the land of the informant and started to construct house and when the informant raised protest, all the accused persons started assaulting the informant and when other family members of the informant came to his rescue, they

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39659 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 2/3 were also assaulted by the accused persons. It is specifically alleged against the petitioner No. 1, Ravindra Manjhi that he assaulted with iron rod on the head of brother of informant, as a result of which, he sustained head injuries. Petitioner No. 2, Subodh Manjhi assaulted the brother of informant by means of Khanti on head.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is also submitted that in the background of some land dispute, the present F.I.R has been registered. There is no accusation of repeating the blow. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, XIII, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 320 of 2021, subject

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39659 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 3/3 to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) nirajkrs/- U T