Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37908 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2026 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.
Sanjeev Kumar S/o Late Janardhan Mandal Resident of Bhitti, ThanaSabour, District- Bhagalpur 2.
Rajeev Kumar S/o Late Janardhan Mandal Resident of Bhitti, ThanaSabour, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 has antecedent of one case and petitioner no. 2 is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his land was measured by Amin, accordingly, the informant along with his brother were cleaning their land when petitioners came and assualted by gandasa causing injury on hand and Sanjeev is an accused in a murder case.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37908 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/2 the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific and even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury has been opined to be simple in nature and is on non-vital part of the body. It is next submitted that petitioners and the informant are agnates and are having dispute relating to property.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 129 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T