Ramashray Kumar @ Ramashray Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40515 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2024 Thana- PIPRIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Ramashray Kumar @ Ramashray Singh S/O Late Hirdaynarayan Singh Village- Ramchandrapur, PS- Pipariya, Distt.- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 448, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case. It is next submitted that the informant alleges that acused persons came inside the house and on orders of Ramanand Singh, the named accused persons fired causing fire arm injury to his son. Further, Dharmraj Singh and petitioner also fired at the informant but missed. It is submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the intant case by the informant. It is next submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40515 of 2025(3) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 petitioner along with Dharmraj fired but no injury was caused to the informant. No doubt, informant in the FIR alleges that other accused persons caused fire arm injury to his son but then from perusal of the injury report of the son of the informant, it would manifest that no fire arm injury was caused to him.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner but then is not in a position to rebut the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that fire arm injury was not caused to the son of the informant after perusing the injury report.

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Pipariya P.S. Case No. 49 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T