Patna High CourtCR. REV./1061/2014dismissed

Pushpa Kumari @ Seema Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-28Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.1061 of 2014 ====================================================== Pushpa Kumari @ Seema Kumari, wife of Naresh Prasad @ Naresh Gupta, resident of village Ghuspuri, P.O.- Ghushpuri, Police Station Sheikhpura, District Sheikhpura. At present, residing at Shila Sadan, Yamuna Path, Harnichak More, Anisabad, Police Station Phulwarisharif, District Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ravi Kumar Mishra, son of Bhola Prasad Mishra @ Purohit

3. Anant Kumar Mishra, son of Bhola Prasad Mishra @ Purohit

4. Tara Devi @ Tara Mishra, wife of Bhola Prasad Mishra @ Purohit

5. Bhola Prasad Mishra @ Bhola Prasad Purohit, son of Ganesh Prasad Purohit

6. Wife (name not known) of Ravi Kumar Mishra

7. Wife (name not known) of Anant Kumar Mishra 2 to 7 are resident of village Sohnana, P.O.- Siswan, Police Station and District Nawada

8. suni Kumar, son of Arjun Chauhan, resident of village Bhadani Beldari, Police Station and District Nawada

9. Smt. Damyanti Devi, wife of Naresh Prasad Verma, resident of Mohalla Darji Tola, P.O. + Police Station + District- Nawada 10.

Naresh Prasad Verma, son of not known, resident of Mohalla Darji Tola, P.O. + Police Station + DistrictNawada 11.

Sudhir Kumar, son of Late Shyam Bihari Prasad, resident of Mohalla Darji Tola, P.O. + Police Station + District- Nawada .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Indu Kumari Srivastava (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-02-2017 By order, dated 07.07.2014, learned Chief

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1061 of 2014 (2) dt.28-02-2017 2/2 Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, has dismissed a complaint case filed by the petitioner for non-prosecution. From the order sheet, I find that on several occasions, when the complaint petition was posted for taking statement of the complainant on solemn affirmation, the complainant did not appear.

In such circumstance, the dismissal of the complaint case cannot be said to be unjustified. This application has no merit, which is accordingly dismissed.

Prabhakar Anand/- (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) U √ T √