← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11/2019dismiss for nonprosecution

Sushma Kumari v. Bihar Rajya

2025-09-09Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11 of 2019 ====================================================== Sushma Kumari Pita Shree Brahamdeo Prasad, Gram- Murhena, Thana - Rajauli, Zila - Nawada (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

Bihar Rajya 2.

Pradhan Sachiv, Manav Sansadhan Vikash Vibhag, Bihar Sarkar, Patna. 3.

Zila Shikshak Padadhikari, Nawada.

4.

Zila Jan Shiksha Padadhikari, Nawada.

5.

Adhyaksh, Rajya Apiliya Pradhikar, Shiksha Vibhag, Patna Bihar, Patna. 6.

Sadasya Zila Shikshak Niyojan Apiliya Pradhikar, Nawada. 7.

Mukhiya Sah Adhiyaksh Niyojan Ekai Gram Panchayat Raj Murhaina, Prakhand- Rajauli, Zila - Nawada.

8.

Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Raj Murhaina Prakhand Rajauli Zila Nawada.

9.

Pradhanadhayapak, Prathmik Vidyalaya Bhupatpur, Gram Panchayat Raj Murhaina, Prakhand - Rajauli, Zila - Nawada.

10.

Sanju Kumari, Pita - Ishwari Prasad, Pati Bhuneshwar Prasad GramBhupatpur, Thana- Rajauli, Zila - Nawada. 11.

Manoj Kumar, S/o Hari Lal, R/o Village - Murhania, P.O. - Chamotha, P.S. - Rajauli, District - Nawada.

12.

Pawan Kumar, S/o Janardan Prasad Sinha, R/o Naveen Nagar, besides Civil Court, P.S. Nawadah, District - Nawadah.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

None for the Respondent :

Mr. Ram vinay Pd. Singh, AC to GA-12 For the Resp. No. 10 :

Mr. Ram Sagar Singh, Advocate Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025 On the last occasion, this matter was heard on 02.09.2025 and on which date, respondent no. 10 and 12 were represented by their respective counsel and counsel for the State was also present, however, no one represented on behalf of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11 of 2019(9) dt.09-09-2025 2/2

2. Today also, no one is representing on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Ajit Kumar, J) Shahnawaz/- U