Sudama Sing, v. Tulsi Prasad,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

SECOND APPEAL No.458 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Sudama Sing, Son of Late Babu Lal Mahto, 2.

Rajeshwari Singh @ Rajeshwar Singh, Son of Late Babu Lal Mahto, 3.

Awadhesh Singh, Son of Late Babul Lal Mahto, 4.

Ramesh Singh, Son of Late Babu Lal Mahto, 5.

Laxmina Kuer, Wife of Late Sidheshwar Singh, 6.

Anand Singh @ Anand Kumar, Son of Late Sidheshwar Singh, 7.

Indradev Singh @ Indradeo Kumar, Son of Late Sidheshwar Singh, 8.

Smt. Falumuna Devi, D/o Late Babu Lal Singh, 9.

Bihari Mahto, Son of Late Nanhaku Mahto, 10.

Chhathu Mahto, Son of Late Nanhaku Mahto, 11.

Manakiya Kuer, Wife of Late Sahdeo Mahto, 12.

Ram Raj Mahto @ Ramraj, Son of Late Sahdeo Mahto, 13.

Deoraj Mahto @ Deo Raj Singh, Son of Late Sahdeo Mahto, 14.

Sahraj Mahto, Son of Late Sahdeo Mahto, 15.

Firangi Mahto, Son of Late Sahdeo Mahto, 16.

Maharaj Mahto, Son of Late Sahdeo Mahto, All residents of Village- Pathra, P.O. and P.S.- Tilauthu District Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

Tulsi Prasad, Son of Late Sheo Shanker Ram, Resident of Village- Tilauthu, P.O. and P.S.- Tilauthu District Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2020 A mentioning slip has been filed on behalf of the appellants. Let it be kept on record.

By filing mentioning slip, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal as

Patna High Court SA No.458 of 2018(4) dt.25-02-2020 2/2 the dispute has already been resolved between the parties. Considering the aforesaid facts, the present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U