Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37390/2025allowed

Nirmal Kumar @ Nirmal Saw @ Niman Saw v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-01Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37390 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2025 Thana- SUHAIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Nirmal Kumar @ Nirmal Saw @ Niman Saw S/O Suresh Saw Resident of Village- Manjhauli, P.O- Salaiya, P.S- Soihal, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Namrata Mishra, Sr. Advocate Ms. Archana Jha, Advocate Ms. Anamika Kumari, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 8, 15(c), 18, 25 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from a pick-up, huge amount of contraband was reovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the name of this petitioner has been framed in this case because his father is the owner of the said pick-up. Nobody has seen the petitioner on the place of seizure

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37390 of 2025(4) dt.01-09-2025 2/2 rather chowikdar has disclosed that he is the driver of the said pick-up. Nothing has been recovered from his possession and even he is not the owner of the said vehicle. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 14.04.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sohail P.S. Case No. 08 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, NDPS Act, Gaya.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T