← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4117/2014disposed

Rajeshwar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-24Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4117 of 2014 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19578 of 2010 ====================================================== Rajeshwar Prasad Singh s/o Late Basistha Singh resident of Bengali Tola, P.S. Laheria Sarai, District - Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Anjani Kumar Singh, the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Mihir Kumar Singh, Secretary Minor Irrigation, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. Narayan Paswan, Chief Engineer ( N ), Tube Well, Muzaffarpur

5. Chaturbhuj Ram, Superintending Engineer, Tube Well Circle Darbhanga

6. Prahlad Prtasad, Executive Engineer, Tube Well Division, Darbhanga .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarendra Narayan, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

This court vide order dated 13.05.2014 disposed of the writ application bearing CWJC No. 19578 of 2010 with a direction to take a final decision with regard to grant of admissible benefits of the two ACP to the petitioner in accordance with law and grant of monetary benefits also. The authority has considered the case of the petitioner and rejected the same vide order dated 24.10.2014 (Annexure-E to the show cause) stating therein that the petitioner

Patna High Court MJC No.4117 of 2014 (3) dt.24-05-2017 2/2 is not entitled to the ACP and other monetary benefits. In such view of the matter, there is no need to proceed further in the matter. Accordingly, the present contempt proceeding is dropped. If the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the order dated 24.10.2014, he is at liberty to take legal course in accordance with law.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mishra/- U