Md. Saddam @ Md. Saddam Hussain v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39921 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-429 Year-2021 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj ====================================================== MD. SADDAM @ MD. SADDAM HUSSAIN SON OF ALI IMAM R/O VILLAGE- RASAULI, P.S.- PANAPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Narendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged that a dead body of a lady was thrown after committing murder and on information of Chaukidar, the present FIR has been filed.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner for implicating him in the present case. Petitioner is in custody since 22.12.2021.
The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39921 of 2022(3) dt.10-01-2023 2/2 the State and learned counsel for the informant and submitted that in para 24 of the case diary it is mentioned that at his instance weapon used in alleged crime has been recovered. As per postmortem report, doctor has opined cause of death due to haemourahage and shock. During examination, several witnesses have supported the prosecution story in paras 34, 35 and 36 of the case diary.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
The trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial as early as possible.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U