Sonelal Sahani @ Sonelal Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49626 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2021 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran ====================================================== SONELAL SAHANI @ SONELAL SAHNI Son of Bhoti Sahni @ Bhoghi Sahani Resident of Village- Bhatahan, P.S.- Motihari Muffasil, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 137 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 399 & 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-b)a, 26 and 35 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49626 of 2021(3) dt.28-06-2022 2/2 that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case on the confessional statement of apprehended co-accused due to animosity. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that considering the nature of allegation, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T