Vijay Nandan Yadav @ Brij Nandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37503 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-646 Year-2019 Thana- KHAGARIA COMPALINT CASE District- Khagaria ====================================================== Vijay Nandan Yadav @ Brij Nandan Yadav S/O- Umesh Yadav Village- Raun Ps- Alauli Dist- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 646 of 2019 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 494, 323 and 498/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the complainant has alleged that she has been tortured mentally and physically by her in-laws and they have demanded Rs. 3 lakhs as dowry. She has further alleged that after one year of marriage she was kicked out from her matrimonial house and her husband has solemnized second marriage.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37503 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/2 It is submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant. It is alleged that he demanded Rs. 3 lakhs as dowry from his in-laws and also tortured the complainant. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full dignity and honour. It is further submitted that the allegation of second marriage of the petitioner is totally false. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2025, having no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.
5. Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Complaint Case No. 646 of 2019.
(Khatim Reza, J) prabhat/- U T