Santan Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15226 of 2021 ====================================================== Santan Prasad Singh Son of Kameshwar Prasad Singh resident of VillageUmga P.S.- Madanpur District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Old Secretariat Bihar Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department Government of Bihar Patna.

3.

The Commissioner Magadh Division Gaya.

4.

The District Magistrate Aurangabad.

5.

The District Land Acquisition Officer Aurangabad. 6.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Aurangabad. 7.

The District Certificate Officer Aurangabad.

8.

The Circle Officer Madanpur District- Aurangabad. 9.

The Union of India through the Secretary Department of Road Transport and Highways New Delhi.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For Respondent No. 9.

:

Mr. R.K. Sharma, CGC Mr. Saket Anand, Advocate Mr. Komal Choubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam (AAG-12) Mr. Arun Kumar Bhagat, AC to AAG-12 For Intervenor :

Mr. Vikas Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 19-05-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with a liberty to question the legality of the order dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.15226 of 2021(2) dt.19-05-2022 2/2 15.02.2021 passed by the competent authority-cum-Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Aurangabad, which has been brought on record by way of Annexure-D to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents No. 4 to 7.

It is being argued that the said order was never served upon the petitioner.

Be that as it may, without going into the merits of the case, the application is permitted to be withdrawn with the liberty as sought on behalf of the petitioner. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) K.K.RAO/- U