Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41372 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2024 Thana- DOBHI District- Gaya ====================================================== Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Kumar Yadav S/o- Bindeshwar Yadav VillGhorbadih West PS-Dobhi Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Dobhi P.S. Case no.92 of 2024 registered under sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that as a result of construction of house on the land belonging to him, the 13 named accused persons including the petitioner herein came variously armed. It is further stated that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41372 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 2/3 petitioner and one Ranjeet Kumar assaulted the informant on his head with a khanti leading to grievous injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. It is submitted that the parties are agnates and the injury report does not support the allegation of assault by so many persons. It is further submitted that there is admitted land dispute between the parties which is evident from the contents of the FIR itself. There is case and counter case and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He undertakes to cooperate in the case.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation of assault by the petitioner and one another on the informant, resulting in grievous injury having been caused on the head of the informant, in the facts of the case, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and the application is rejected.

7. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the learned Court below within a period of four weeks.

8. It is directed that if the petitioner surrenders within

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41372 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 3/3 the aforesaid period and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered without being prejudiced by this order of rejection. (Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T