Patna High CourtL.P.A/1510/2014dismissed

M/S Nava Pacs Rice Mill v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-08Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1510 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10419 of 2014 =========================================================== M/s Nava Pacs Rice Mill Nava, through its Proprietor Mahendra Prasad Son Of Sri Dwarika Yadav, Resident of Village-Verma,P.S-Cherki(Bodh Gaya),District-Gaya .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary ,Food &Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Gaya

3. The Bihar State Food &Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.through it's Chairman

4. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, District Office Gaya at Gaya

5. The District Supply officer Gaya

6. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Sadar,Gaya

7. The Enforcement Officer, Deputed on M/s Nava PACS Rice Mill,Nava,DistrictGaya

8. The Block Supply Officer, Bodh Gaya,District-Gaya .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Binay Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, GP-21 For the BSFC :

Mr. Anjani Kumar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 08-05-2017 None on behalf of the appellant.

Counsel for the BSFC is present.

Besides what the Learned Single Judge had to say on 04.09.2014, which is the subject matter of appeal, this Court can only observe that such matters have already been dealt with and

Patna High Court LPA No.1510 of 2014 dt.08-05-2017 2/2 decided with clear directives as to what is required to be done. Therefore, no separate order is required to be passed with regard to the impugned order, over and above, what the Learned Single Judge had had to say.

Appeal has no merit, it is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 09.05.2017 Transmission Date