Surya Prakash Prajapati @ Suryaprakash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38651 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2026 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Surya Prakash Prajapati @ Suryaprakash Kumar S/o - Suresh Prajapati @ Suresh Prajapat R/o Village- Obra, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad. 2.

Aditya Prajapati @ Aditya Kumar S/o- Suresh prajapati @ Suresh Prajapat R/o Village- Obra, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukul Kumari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Vide order dated 17.06.2026, a typographical error occurred wherein a post-mortem report was recorded instead of an injury report; the same is directed to be corrected.

2. Counter-affidavit on behalf of the District Magistrate, Aurangabad has been taken on record.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

4. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 151 of 2026, registered for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 303(2) & 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

5. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38651 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 2/2 along with co-accused are said to have assaulted the victim and caused him grievous injuries.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence. The petitioners have one criminal antecedent.

7. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that all the offences with which the petitioners are charged are heinous in nature, and therefore, they should not be granted bail.

8. Considering the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

9. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

10. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) sadique/- U T