Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10924 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -274 Year- 2015 Thana -KOTWALI District- MUNGER ====================================================== Ranjit Yadav, son of Chhotan Yadav, Resident of Village- Shyampur, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Neeraj Kumar Alias Sanidh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is a second attempt made by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No 274 of 2015 registered for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. It has been submitted by the petitioner that earlier the petitioner moved for bail and this Court, vide order dated 19.01.2017 passed in Cr Misc No 49619 of 2016, has disposed of the application of the petitioner with liberty to petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case. It has also been submitted that now charge has been framed which is apparent from Annexure 4 and, in this case, name of petitioner transpires only on the basis of confessional statement of co-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10924 of 2017 (2) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 accused.

Heard learned APP also. Learned APP has stated that the petitioner has criminal antecedent also. Having heard both sides and in view of the submission as above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Munger in Sessions Trial No 299 of 2016 corresponding Kotwali Police Station Case No 274 of 2015, subject to the conditions that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the Court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) M.E.H./- U T