Gautam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10980 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -127 Year- 2016 Thana -BRAHMPUR District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Gautam Yadav Son of Kishan Kanhaiya Yadav, Resident of VillageLewar, P.S. Krishna Brahm, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2017 Heard both sides.

The petitioner seeks bail in Krishna Brahm P.S. case No. 127 of 2016 under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 of POCSO Act.

The petitioner is alleged to have committed unnatural offence with the son of informant.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation is false and concocted. The petitioner and victim are friends and on account of some petty dispute the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case.

Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10980 of 2017 (3) dt.07-04-2017 2/2 The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within six months from the date of receipt of this order after holding the trial on day to day basis. If the trial is not concluded within six months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail firstly in the trial court. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T