Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35461/2019allowed

Raju Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-13Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35461 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-763 Year-2017 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== RAJU KUMAR PASWAN S/o Shyamdev Paswan Resident of VillageBhawanipur, Ward No. 05, P.S.- Fulkaha, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhijeet Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 13-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner is accused in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 763 of 2017 registered under Section 392 of the I.P.C. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that similarly situated co-accused person has already been allowed bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 80250 of 2018 on 30.01.2019.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Araria in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 763 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35461 of 2019(4) dt.13-09-2019 2/2

1) Father will be the bailor of the petitioner.

2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) shailendra/- U T