Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14580/2017bail granted

Deepu Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-30Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14580 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2016 Thana -DEEPNAGAR District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Deepu Yadav, Son of Late Rajendra Yadav, null

2. Akhilesh Yadav, son of Late Hardeo Yadav @ Late Hardesh Yadav, Both resident of Village- Mandilpur, PS.- Rahui, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. null null .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Deepnangar P.S.Case No.195 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

According to the petitioners, he is only member of the mob, except that there is no allegation against him. He is in custody since 30.01.2017. The other co-accused, having similar allegation, have been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 12.01.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.55769 of 2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14580 of 2017 (2) dt.30-03-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Deepnagar P.S.Case No.195 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U