Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15167 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -579 Year- 2014 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar, son of late Kishna Yadav, resident of Village- Unta Madarpur, P.S. Jehanabad, District Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chaubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No. 579 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the FIR and only on the basis of CDR location it has come that one looted SIM was used in the Mobile of the petitioner and for that petitioner has been implicated in this case and he is a auto driver. It has further been submitted that petitioner has clean antecedent and has been in custody for about three months and charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15167 of 2017 (3) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No. 579 of 2014, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U