Jeevan Jyoti v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18440 of 2014 =========================================================== Jeevan Jyoti, Son of Sri Suraj Prasad, Resident of Sultanpur Koeri Tola, Danapur Cantt., Police Station - Danapur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Danapur Nizamat Municipality through its Executive Officer, Danapur.

4. The Executive Officer, Danapur Nizamat Municipality, Danapur, District - Patna.

5. Sanjay Rai Son of Sri Panna Lal Rai

6. Sharda Rai Wife of Sri Sanjay Rai Both 5 and 6 residents of Sultanpur Koeri tola Police Station - Danapur, District- Patna.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Shravan Kumar, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Uday Bhan Singh, AC to GP 19 For the Respondent no.4 : Mr. Ajatshatru, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the Danapur Nizamat Municipality.

The petitioner claims that private respondents have not only encroached the Municipal land of survey plot no. 1345 of Danapur Nizamat Municipality but have also blocked the Nala by constructing permanent structure over 240 sq. feet. It is contended that a complaint was made to the respondent no. 4 on 26.4.2014 itself vide Annexure 1 but no action has been taken as yet. Accordingly, this writ application is being disposed of

Patna High Court CWJC No.18440 of 2014 dt.02-12-2016 2/2 with a direction to the respondent no. 4 to take a decision and bring the concerned matter to its logical conclusion within a period of three months from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order after granting reasonable opportunity to all the concerned including the private respondents.

However, it is made clear that this Court has not formed / expressed any opinion with respect to the merit of the case of the petitioner.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 06.03.2017 Transmission Date NA