Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Raj @ Praduman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42038 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2023 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Raj @ Praduman son of Raj Kumar Singh VillageJadhua Ps- Gangan Bridge Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nidhi Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gangabridge P.S. Case No. 258 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Prosecution case as emanated from the fardbeyan is that while the informant was on his way he was accosted with three unknown miscreants, who snatched his bag containing Rs. 79,546/- , a tab and Biometric machine.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 08-03-2024. Petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42038 of 2024(2) dt.24-06-2024 2/3 bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused, namely, Deepak Kumar, and the same has no evidentiary value. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is lastly submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. Other coaccused has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 0105-2024, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32771 of 2024. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, claim based on parity and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42038 of 2024(2) dt.24-06-2024 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Gangabridge P.S. Case No. 258 of 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T