Golu Kumar @ Fuk Fuk v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35681 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2018 Thana- BARHIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== GOLU KUMAR @ FUK FUK Son of Murari Singh Resident of Village - Dhiradar, P.S.- Barahiya, Distt - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Barahiya P.S. Case No. 273 of 2018, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 307, 387/34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged in the written report that on the date of occurrence petitioner fired from pistol causing injury on the neck of the informant.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that Doctor has found injury to be simple in nature.

Case diary has been received.

The injury report is available in the case diary wherein the Doctor has found one lacerated wound with vertical margin of size 1⁄4" diameter over right side of neck. Margin of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35681 of 2019(3) dt.19-07-2019 2/2 the wound was blackened. There was bleeding from the neck. The Doctor has found firearm injury. He has opined the injury to be simple in nature but, this Court after looking into nature of injury finds that firearm injury has been caused on vital part of the body of informant.

Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

Prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the trial as early as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. In the event no substantive progress is made in the trial, petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T