Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46966/2024bail rejected

Hareram Yadav @ Hare Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-24Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46966 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-626 Year-2023 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Hareram Yadav @ Hare Ram SON OF SUKDEV YADAV @ SUKHDEV YADAV Village - SHAYAMPUR GIRI TOLA, PS- KUCHAYKOT, DISTGOPALGANJ ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar Shukla, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 626 of 2023 dated 22.12.2023 registered for the offence punishable u/ss 304B, 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have tortured the informant's daughter mentally and physically due to non-fulfillment of demand of a Motorcycle as dowry. On 22.12.2023 at about 7:00 A.M., the informant got information that the petitioner and the co-accused persons have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46966 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 2/3 committed murder of her daughter for the sake of dowry and her dead body was disappeared by the accused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2023. It is further submitted that the charge sheet has already been submitted u/s 306 and 20 of the I.P.C.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased who committed murder due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. The impugned order dated 01.05.2024 does shows that the charge sheet had been submitted u/s 306 and 20 of the I.P.C

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and the same is rejected in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 626 of 2023 pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M1st, Gopalganj.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46966 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 3/3

7. The application stands rejected.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Jyoti/- U T