Pintu Kumar @ Pintu @ Anish Kumar Pintu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39464 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2021 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Pintu Kumar @ Pintu @ Anish Kumar Pintu, Son Of Vindeshwar Ray Resident Of Village - Sultanpur, P.S. Industrial Area, District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey (APP.84) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 414/ 34 of the I.P.C. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and the allegation is of recovery of 240.840 litres of liquor from six wheeler vehicle parked at a deserted area.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is next submitted that petitioner is neither the owner, nor the driver of the vehicle

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39464 of 2022(2) dt.24-08-2022 2/2 and he came to be implicated because of his antecedent by local people.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Raghopur P. S. Case No.263 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T