← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2773/2016dismissed

The Vice Chancellor, B. N. Mandal University And ORS v. Dayanand Nayak And ORS

2018-01-10Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2773 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8471 of 2014 ======================================================

1. The Vice - Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura.

2. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura.

3. The Finance Officer, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Dayanand Nayak son of Late Mauzi Lal Nayak resident of Mohalla - Mahabir Chowk, Police Station - Kasba and District - Purnia.

2. The State of Bihar

3. The Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Principal, M.L. Arya College, Akshay Nagar, Kasba, Purnia.

5. The Vice - Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

6. The Registrar, L. N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha GA-1 For the University :

Mr. Md. Nadim Saraj Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 10-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The Court is not satisfied with the reasons and justification, indicated in the modification application, to modify the order imposing cost upon the two authorities. In fact, if the payments etc. had already been done to the petitioner and his grievance had been redressed, these facts should have been brought to the notice of the Court, when the matter was taken up, because the

Patna High Court MJC No.2773 of 2016(4) dt.10-01-2018 2/2 writ application remained pending for almost two years. This is all the more reasons that the Court is not inclined to pass any order in favour of the petitioners.

The Court is not inclined to interfere with the order. Modification application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) skm/- U