Patna High CourtMJC/3959/2014allowed

Manorma Devi And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-11Mr. Justice Navaniti Prasad Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3959 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2094 of 1998 ======================================================

1. Manorma Devi W/o Late Bishwanath Singh

2. Nand Kishore Singh

3. Sudhir Kumar Singh

4. Prabhat Kumar Singh All Sons of Late Bishwanath Singh

5. Kiran Singh W/o Late Subindra Pal Singh Al Resident of MohallaKalambagh Road Opposite Excise God Down, P.S.-Kazi Mohadpur, District-Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Director, Consolidation, Budh Marg, Patna.

3. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Consolidation Office, Kurani, under the District of Muzaffarpur

5. The Assistant Consolidation Office, Kurani, Muzaffarpur.

6. Ram Sagar Sahani Son of Late RAmfal Sahani Resident of VillageChhajan Tola, Manaria, P.S.-Kurani, District-Muzaffarpur.

7. Yoshoda Devi @ NIrmala Devi W/o Late Kalpanath Singh

8. Pinki

9. Bebey Jyotee

10. Jyotee

11. Rozee

12. Sheo Kumar Singh @ Sheojee Singh S/o Late Kalpanath Singh All daughter of Kalpanth Singh All Resodent No. 7 to 12 are Resident of Mohalla-Islampur near Kalambah Road (L.S. College,).At present residing at Mohalla-Rajendra Nagar, Road NO.2(A), District-Patna.

13. Dr. Saligram Singh Son of Late Dharm Nath Singh Resident of Mohalla-Islampur, Opposite L.S. College Main Gate, Muzaffarpur, at present posted as Hospital Civil Surgeon, Saharsa, District-Saharsa. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Aulaul Kumar (Aag6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-03-2015 For the reasons stated in this application, this application

Patna High Court MJC No.3959 of 2014 (3) dt.11-03-2015 2 / 2 is allowed. C.W.J.C.No. 2094 of 1998 in so far as it relates to respondent no.13 and his substituted heirs as well as the writ petition stand restored, subject to such objection as the private respondents may raise at the time of final hearing. It is stated that the processes have been filed in respect of the substituted heirs of respondent no.13 to the writ application. Let the office act thereon in regard to substitution of respondent no.13. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) B.Roy/- U