Umesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10708 of 2017 (3) dt.07-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10708 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2016 Thana -MEERGANJ District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Umesh Sah, son of Drup Sah, resident of Village- Balahatta, P.O.- Baleshra, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandrasen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Meerganj P.S. Case No. 48 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 48 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the three motorcycle borne criminals stopped the informant and after pointing out Katta snatched the motorcycle and mobile of the informant.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is in custody since 14.12.2016, he has not been put on test identification parade and nothing has been recovered from his possession. The name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused Shambhu Singh and besides that there is no other material against him and as such he deserves

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10708 of 2017 (3) dt.07-04-2017 sympathetic consideration.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Meerganj P.S. Case No. 48 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T