← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12614/2016disposed

Md. Abdul Matin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-26Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12614 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Abdul Matin son of Abdul Hamid Khan resident of Mohalla - Gandhi Path, Ward No. 21, Saharsa, P.S. + District - Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura through its Registrar.

4. The Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura.

5. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura.

6. The Finance Officer, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura.

7. The Principal, Ramesh Jha Mahila College, Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Mukul, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anil Bhushan, AC to GP16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 26-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been discriminated, whereas the similarly circumstanced other persons have been considered for regularization.

If the respondent-University is maintaining the stand of regularizing the services of non-teaching employees and if the petitioner stands on the similar footing and juniors have been regularized, the University is directed to give similar treatment to the petitioner. However, this court does not express any

Patna High Court CWJC No.12614 of 2016(2) dt.26-03-2018 2/2 opinion on the merit of the claim of the petitioner and it is for the University to consider and take decision on the entitlement of the petitioner for regularization. Decision in this regard must be taken expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U