Patna High CourtCWJC/7177/2012dismissed

Madhusudan Singh And ANR v. Sitaram Singh And ORS

2015-03-24Mr. Justice V. Nath2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.7177 of 2012 (8) dt.24-03-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7177 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Madhusudan Singh.

2. Ambica Singh.

Sl.No.1 & 2 both sons of Late Ram Saroop Singh, Resident of Tezpurwa Tola Chainpur, P.S.-Marhaura, District-Saran.-(Plaintiffs)-Petitioners.

Versus

1. Sitaram Singh, Son of Ram Kishun Singh, R/o Kaswa Maker Tola Shiva Singh, Pachim Thahara, P.O.+P.S.-Maker at present Tezpurwa Tola Chainpur Shivganj, P.S.-Marhaura, District-Saran. -Defendant 1st set-Respondent 1st set.

2. Shanti Devi W/o Sitaram Singh, Resident of Kaswa Maker Tola Shiva Singh, Pachim Thahara, at present Tezpurwa Tola Chainpur Shivganj, P.O.-Mirjapur, P.S.-Marhaura, District-Saran.

3. Beejli Rai, Son of Basgeet Rai.

4. Lalan Sah, Son of Ram Awtar Sah.

5. Chandrashekhar Yadav, Son of Raj Narayan Yadav, Sl.No.3 to 5 resident of Tezpurwa, Post-Tezpurwa, P.S.Marhaura, District-Saran.

6. Ashok Singh, Son of Basdeo Singh.

7. Ravindra Sharma, Son of Sridhar Sharma.

Both Resident of Aata Post Ata, Viz-Silhourhi, P.S.-Marhaura, DistrictSaran.

8. Ramjee Singh, Son of Late Sukdeo Singh, R/o Demoudarpur, PostMirjapur, P.S.-Marhaura, District-Saran.

9. Ram Suran Rai, Son of Pradeep Rai, R/o Tarau, Post-Tezpurwa, P.S.- Marhaura, District-Saran. -Defendant 2nd set-Respondent 2nd set. ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mallika Mazumdar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Miss Vagisha Pragya Vacaknavi, Adv. Mr Binod Kumar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 24-03-2015 Heard Ms. Mallika Mazumdar, the learned

Patna High Court CWJC No.7177 of 2012 (8) dt.24-03-2015 counsel for the petitioner in this writ application. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this writ application has become infructuous. As such, this writ application is dismissed as infructuous.

(V. Nath, J) Nitesh/- U