← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36133/2020bail granted

Parmod Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2021-03-26Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36133 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2020 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== Parmod Paswan Son of Bishan Lal Paswan @ Visan Lal Paswan Resident of village- Dharmeshwar Gachh ward no. 13, P.s.- Jokihat, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nafisuzzoha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 506, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, while in course of morning walk, the informant came to his land, he saw the accused persons dragging away electric pole by causing damage to Govt. property. The informant started recording videography which aroused the accused persons as a result of which, they assaulted the informant. It is further alleged that when informant's brother and cousin brother came to rescue him, they were also assaulted. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36133 of 2020(2) dt.26-03-2021 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Free fight is alleged to have taken place between the parties. The injury on the side of the accused has not been explained by the prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 144 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T