Pankaj Kumar @ Randhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39622 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2023 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar @ Randhir Kumar, Son Of Sanjay Mehta, Village Kusadhi @ Kusarhi (BUT In Fir Given As Resident Of Village- Tarar, Ps- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad (BIHAR) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Ajit Kumar, Son of Late Ishwar Mistri, Resident of Village- Bhurkunda, P.SGoh, District- Aurangabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs. Rupa Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore(App100), APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-07-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 54 of 2023 dated 11.02.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/s 366A of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, the co-accused Kundan Kumar is alleged to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant by enticing her for the purpose of marriage or selling her under conspiracy.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39622 of 2023(2) dt.12-07-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the statement of the witness Lalo Devi as stated in para 6 of the bail petition. He has further submitted that there was love affairs between the petitioner and the victim. The petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 27.02.2023. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Aurangabad, Bihar in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 54 of 2023.
The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T