Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5571/2017disposed

Sanjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5571 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2014 Thana -PATNA GRP CASE District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Sanjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Singh, son of Late Garib Singh, resident of village- Malpur, P.S. Maranchi, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of bail in connection with G.R.P. Mokama (Hathidah) P.S.Case No.35/2014 for the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that originally a case was filed against one Ranjeet Singh and other accused persons but later on an application was filed showing that Ranjeet Singh @ Sanjeet Kumar Singh is the same person and on the other hand he has been falsely implicated in this case. Further, it is submitted that there is no allegation of firing against this petitioner and he is in custody since 2.11.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. From perusal of the petition, it

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5571 of 2017 (3) dt.16-02-2017 2/2 appears that the petitioner is accused in 13 other cases also, no doubt the plea has been taken that his name has not appeared initially in the case but later on he has been made accused showing that he is Ranjeet Sigh @ Sanjeet Kumar Singh. However, considering the allegation and antecedent, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of six months, if not concluded, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the court concerned itself and the learned court below will pass appropriate order without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U