Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38082/2026dismissed

Sanvar Alam @ Sanwar Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-16Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38082 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2026 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sanvar Alam @ Sanwar Alam Son of Ismayal Miyan R/O Ward No. 2, Mangalpur-Kala, P.S.- Nautan, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

X Daughter of Y R/O Village - Baikunthwa, Dabariya, P.S.- Nautan, District - West Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Aditya Nath Pandey, Adv.

Ms. Neha Kumari, Adv.

Ms. Aprajita Kumari, Adv.

Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026 registered for offences under Sections 64, 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have committed rape with the victim on a number of occasions.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He submits that it is a case of consensual sex and when the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38082 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/2 petitioner refused to marry, this false case has been instituted. The petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the allegation levelled, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) sadique/- U T