Rahul Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5141 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -75 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHAJITPUR District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Rahul Singh, Son of Mohan Singh, Resident of Village- Pipra Telia Tola, Police Station- Sahajitpur, District- Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 47 & 63 of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather the allelged recovery has been made from the co-accused of this case, who has already been granted the privilege of regular bail by this Court vide order dated 20.12.2016 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 48173 of 2016 and the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 11.12.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and other co-accused of this case having similar allegation has already been granted regular bail, let the petitioner above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5141 of 2017 (2) dt.15-02-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-VIII, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2016,subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T