Md. Naushad @ Nausad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37260 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2024 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Naushad @ Nausad, S/O Md. Manowar Ali, R/O Village- Naya Bhargama, Ward No. 5, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 311 of 2024, registered for the alleged offences under Section 309 (4) of BNS, 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, four miscreants robbed the informant and another person while they had been going to purchase fish on their Tempo. On gunpoint, the miscreants snatched Rs. 26,000/- and a mobile phone from the informant and his associate and also assaulted them. The co-accused Md. Aslam was identified by the informant, who disclosed the name of this petitioner for also being involved in the occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37260 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/3 petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the person/possession of this petitioner. The tower location of the mobile number of the petitioner is stated to be at the same place, but the petitioner is resident of the said place and there is nothing unusual about the tower location of mobile number of the petitioner at the place of occurrence. The petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case and he is on bail in that case. The petitioner is in custody since 06.03.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. The learned APP submits that the petitioner and other co-accused were involved in robbing the informant and his associate.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made hereinabove and considering the fact that no recovery has been shown from the petitioner and further considering the period of custody of the petitioner and submission of charge sheet, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Araria/court concerned, in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37260 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 3/3 connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 311 of 2024, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480 (3) of BNSS and also the following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T